« Hector Babenco’s Carandiru |
Main
| Inkheart »
Bride Wars
Wedding
Fantasies Denied
Hollywood Scratches in the Dirt of the Marital Myth
By Cole Smithey
With a
title like "Bride Wars" you'd expect some explosive comic moments of
wedding sabotage and subterfuge, but instead you get a clunky formulaic
romantic comedy, even by Hollywood standards.
Had Liv (Kate Hudson) married her best friend and rival Emma (Anne Hathaway) it
would have at least followed in the manner of the pair's giddy lovefest
relationship that suffers a relatively brief catfight. Best friends since
childhood, Liv and Emma have long shared a dream of holding their wedding day
at Manhattan's glamorous
Plaza Hotel. Crisis comes via wedding planner extraordinaire Marion St. Claire
(regally played by Candice Bergen), whose voice-over narration provides
unnecessary exposition. Marion's
facade of nuptial planning perfection collapses when she mixes the dates of
Liv's and Emma's June weddings to coincide on the same day. Obligatory
shopping, arguing, and dance sequences lead to a feeble climax. For their part,
Hudson and Hathaway share little chemistry together in spite of their polished
individual comic abilities. The worst thing about "Bride Wars" is
that it's a boring movie.
Every year Hollywood spits out a quota of romantic comedies not fit
even for airline viewing. As years pass, the standby of rom-coms centered
around weddings have started to resemble museum artifacts associated with a
tradition of marriage that more and more people look at as obsolete. From its
opening childhood flashback sequence of young Liv and little Emma gazing
longingly at the bride in a wedding ceremony, "Bride Wars" adopts a
condescending tone of commercial satisfaction that Kate and Liv have bought
into hook, line, and sinker. The film's would-be target audience of 10 to
16-year-old girls will want to go home and prissy themselves up dreaming of a
day that, as statistics show, may not come. That's not to say that this
audience is missing the retail message about buying clothes, jewelry, make-up,
and all-things "dreamy."
Emma's low
income as a school teacher matters not compared with Liv's fat bank account
from working as a hotshot corporate attorney. The income discrepancy is just
one of many ripe opportunities for satire that the screenwriting committee of
Greg DePaul ("Saving Silverman"), Casey Wilson, and June Diane
Raphael skip over in favor of stumbling through two acts of "OMG"
shopping kissyface. The about-to-be-husbands are as bland as toast, and it's in
this particular area of masculine representation that the writers hit a stream
of false notes. Without interesting secondary characters, the film has nowhere
to go when the camera isn't on Hudson
or Hathaway.
Kate Hudson
is listed as one of the film's three producers and at this point in her
active-but-second-rate career, she seems to believe doing a fluff movie opposite
rising star Anne Hathaway will lend some momentum in spite of the source material's
less than banal substance. It's been a long time since Hudson's terrific performance in "Almost
Famous" made her famous, and the young actress is clearly capable of much
better work. Sometimes you just need better script readers.
(20th
Century Fox) Rated PG. 90 mins. (C-)
Posted by Cole Smithey on
January 16, 2009 | Permalink
Save to del.icio.us |
Digg This
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c2b7953ef010536d92c16970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Bride Wars :
Comments
Post a comment